Active Paths and Desire Lines
Friday July 17th 2009, 3:04 pm
Filed under: Infrastructure,Pedestrian,Planning,Transportation,Urbanism,Visualization

MFO Park

A “desire line” is the preferred path which one takes to get from one place to another, often referring to the worn path through grass, shrubs or any other location which was not designed or designated for pedestrian traffic. Chances are there is a sidewalk nearby but has been considered the less direct route and therefore is the least perferred option. I’ve been thinking a lot lately about what the desire lines and active patterns might look on a city-wide scale.

While visiting MFO Park near Zürich, Switzerland there was a very interesting phenomenon, a desire line that quite literally glowed. Even though the park acts similar to a plaza in that there are no paths, the whole site is meant for walking, there was a very distinct path that many people took on a continual basis. This connection is between the public transit and a residential portion of the neighborhood which the park essentially was placed right in the middle of. So the people just cut through the park and slip past wall-like clipped hedges that border the edge of the site.

MFO Park
images via Lisa Town

The way people navigate through space is such a huge piece of the design puzzle, it shapes cities and forms experiences. I often thought it would be really interesting to be able to track people in a more visual way in how they go about their day. I wonder what kind of patterns would form as their lines crossed large spaces, cut corners and brought to light the eaiest way in the pedestrians mind to get from point A to point B. Especially now that there is a greater shift from the vehicular and more focus on those on foot or wheels. How do these people move through the urban fabric in a vehicular world? What could their paths tell us about how a city’s infrastructure could potentially be restructured to better fit the needs of the people now and in the future?

I wrote recently in reference to an article on Copenhagenize about the bike counter. This is a really interesting device but while it may explain the chapter about how many people use a specific path and the patterns of time and day usage, such a device wouldn’t explain the whole story of perhaps what other paths people would like to use. It would be really interesting if there was a way to be able to track people ithat was effortless and allowed them to go about their typical day while still furthering the experiment. How cool would it be to deploy such an experiment and, after say a week, have the city turned into a life size urban traffic diagram?

Urban bike paths
image via contrail

Pepin Gelardi has thought of this as well and came up with something called Contrail as part of Design21′s Power To The Pedal” design competition. From Contrail’s website: “Contrail is a tool for developing bicycle communities. As you ride, contrail leaves a faint chalk line behind your bike. The goal is to encourage a new cycle of biking participation by allowing the biking community to leave a unique mark on the road and to reclaim this crucial shared space.”

Contrail points out an interesting note in that by actively placing lines where cyclists go, cars become aware of the use and the hope is that they would then become more aware and cautious of the cyclists. In addition, this could spur on more cyclists to take to the road and follow the masses with the feeling of safety in numbers.

Contrail detail
image via contrail

One interesting thought might be to tap into the power of gps devices and conduct an experiment that tracks people with these devices for a period of time, analyzing the patterns that emerge from the data. It would be really interesting to track not only bikes but pedestrians as well to get a sense of how the entire city operates and even more important, how it could potentially operate even better.



Growth in the underworld
Sunday July 12th 2009, 8:43 pm
Filed under: Food,Infrastructure

Li-sun Mushroom Tunnel

While going through some old photos I came across one of an old abandoned train tunnel in Bavaria that had been partially demolished while another portion left as a piece of history embedded into the hillside, vegetation taking over the stone. There are many things around the world…abandoned tunnels, cellars, bunkers, etc. and what might become of their future? Do they become a forgotten element in time or can they be used again, transferring a piece of history into a new future?

The most recent post over at BLDG BLOG reminded me of the re-purposed single track railway tunnel in the New South Wales Southern Highlands between Mittagong and Bowral, Australia.

Original railway tunnel built in 1866

Built in 1866, the railway was used as the link between Sydney and Canberra until a new double track tunnel was built in 1919. Unused for three decades, the tunnel opened once again in the 1950′s for a new purpose – to grow mushrooms.

The mushrooms have thrived in the damp and poorly lit environment of the railway underworld. Now, the Li-Sun Mushroom Tunnel leads the way in exotic mushroom development in Australia.

Li-Sun Mushroom Tunnel, Mittagong

Li-Sun Mushroom Tunnel
images via jolly_jarvis

I would love the ability to tour these tunnels but since I can’t, it’ll be really interesting to what Geoff Manaugh has to say about them if he gets the opportunity to visit them while on Cockatoo Island for the Urban Islands design studio.



The Great Urban Debate: Seattle vs. Vancouver
Wednesday July 01st 2009, 2:47 pm
Filed under: Infrastructure,Planning,Urbanism

The Great Urban Debate presents by VIA Architecture

Earlier this month VIA Architecture presented The Great Debate, a public event for Seattle and Vancouver to duke it out regarding their urban environments from all angles, addressing the here and now as well as presenting new and challenging ideas for future transformation. The debates happened over two days and in both cities: June 16th in Vancouver and June 18th in Seattle. The debators are Vancouver’s Gordon Price and Seattle’s Peter Steinbruek along with questions taken from the audience and those submitted on the internet.

Videos have just been posted on both of the debates and interesting to see the arguments regarding each city and how each city views the other, see below for the full videos from VIA Architecture.

Round One, June 16th – Vancouver:

Round Two, June 18th – Seattle: